Applying the new equations to unknown questions

If one takes the new perspective of thought that all mass moves according to the two new formulas, then time dilation accounts for everything that moves. 

There are about a dozen new topics (unanswered questions) that are now answered.

Dark matter might be a time dilation with a greater ratio across every nucleon’s diameter in the distant stars.  “What” dark matter is has been answered by the math of the new equation (if deemed right).  “Why” time dilation is greater is offered by only three factors:  That would be - more mass, energy or speed.  To be discussed further with more math results.  We know time is faster in space away from earth, but it would be helpful to know if time was faster than previously calculated.  Voyager 1 and 2 have time dated communication.  A current date stamp would offer interesting data.  The Voyager trip includes the craft passing large masses, so only a current date and time would be best.

Dark Energy:  Same logic as dark matter.  To be discussed further here.

Inside a black hole:  The former scientific thought was that we have a potential singularity from continued gravity.  This new math from this website begs to differ.  Time is slower with mass, and believed to be zero inside a black hole.  Gravity is time dilation affecting moving gluons as defined by the current new equations.  Inside a black hole, as defined by time dilation as a ratio is undefined with time at zero for two different points.  Thus, a black hole would be more like a balloon based on this new math.  Not crushing into a point at the center, but uniformity of pressure based on equal pressure.  The event horizon outwards would be a crushing force of gravity, with time not being zero.  This gives us a lighted event horizon as the photons may now escape with time.  But no singularity is necessary in this scenario,

The Big Bang might be a very large balloon.  This is the same logic as a black hole.  The event horizon stretches as the surface area of a sphere (one over r^2) but the volume of the sphere increases as r^3.  Thus, after a certain growth of a black hole…the surface area would not hold in the pressure.  As our universe exploded at about 10^84 atoms of pressure (per Google, this is the current estimate of atoms in the universe), it looks like 10^84 atoms (or energy equivalents) is about the breaking point.  The question becomes….we must have had 10^84 atoms or there would not have been a Big Bang, but what are the odds there were just 10^84 and no more original atoms?  If there were originally 10^85 atoms, then this means we have 10 universes out there.  All ten new universes are with 10^84 atoms - because 10^84 is the breaking point.  What if the original mass available was equal to 10^168 atoms???  This means we have one new universe for every atom in this universe of ours.  Look at the pencil on your desk.  Then look at a Web or Hubble’s picture of galaxies.  A universe for every atom in our universe?  Hmmmm.  Sounds strange.

Email and comment if you wish.  Timedilationtoe@gmail.com

The remaining list of new answers and physical inventions can wait.